Stuff

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    What's Hot
    Ghost Robotics Main

    Ghost Robotics’ unmanned dog-bots may soon patrol Cape Canaveral Space Force Station

    August 11, 2022

    The Red Bull Campus Clutch esports tournament returns for 2022

    August 11, 2022
    Canon EOS R5 Transformers

    The Canon EOS R5 is a Prime candidate for a Transformers upgrade

    August 11, 2022
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube SoundCloud
    Trending
    • Ghost Robotics’ unmanned dog-bots may soon patrol Cape Canaveral Space Force Station
    • The Red Bull Campus Clutch esports tournament returns for 2022
    • The Canon EOS R5 is a Prime candidate for a Transformers upgrade
    • SA schools to receive updated tech-focused curriculum
    • Know when to Fold ’em? – Our first look at Samsung’s Galaxy Fold 4
    • Blockchain-based certificates. Legitimate qualifications.
    • Disney+ is raising prices in the U.S – what that could mean for us
    • Samsung hopes you’ll Flip – Our first look at the Galaxy Flip 4
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
    StuffStuff
    • News
      • App News
      • Business News
      • Camera News
      • Gaming News
      • Headphone News
      • Industry News
      • Internet News
      • Laptops News
      • Motoring News
      • Other Tech News
      • Phone News
      • Tablet News
      • Technology News
      • TV News
      • Wearables News
    • Reviews
      • Camera Reviews
      • Car Reviews
      • Featured Reviews
      • Game Reviews
      • Headphone Reviews
      • Laptop Reviews
      • Other Tech Reviews
      • Phone Reviews
      • Tablet Reviews
      • Wearables Reviews
    • Columns
    • Stuff Guides
    • Podcasts & Videos
      • Videos
      • Stuffed
      • Stuffing Around
      • Tech Byte
      • T2S2
    • Win
    • Subscribe
      • Print
      • Digital
        • Google Play
        • iTunes
        • Download
        • Zinio
    • Stuff Shop
      • Shop Now
      • My Account
      • Downloads
    • Contact Us
      • Get In Touch
      • Advertise
    0 Shopping Cart
    Stuff
    Home » Columns » The deplatforming of Donald Trump raises concerns about everyone’s speech online
    Columns

    The deplatforming of Donald Trump raises concerns about everyone’s speech online

    Brett VenterBy Brett VenterJanuary 13, 2021Updated:October 1, 2021No Comments7 Mins Read
    Deplatforming main
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Anyone paying even the remotest attention to last week’s news will have noticed that soon-to-be-former American president Donald Trump was toppled from his Twitter throne, with Facebook’s various platforms following suit. The ban, initially a temporary initiative, quickly became a permanent deplatforming for the departing politician.

    In Facebook’s case, Trump is banned from posting to the social network at least until he is no longer the American president. In Twitter’s case, Trump is banned indefinitely. The reason given is that Trump’s “…statements can be mobilized by different audiences, including to incite violence…”, eventually finding that Trump’s account is in violation of Twitter’s Glorification of Violence Policy.

    In addition, alternative social network Parler has found itself deplatformed, as have more than 70,000 QAnon supporters. All of these events, no matter how you may feel about them, raise questions about speech online. Specifically, that your presence on various platforms isn’t tied to anything sensible like rules or a sense of community. It’s tied to how much money you’re worth to the companies that run everything.

    It’s just business

    However you feel about Donald Trump having his social media toys taken away (for the record, I reckon it happened several years too late — but the second best time for it is right now), the circumstances and timing around the ban illustrate something about online speech we might not fully appreciate. And that is that our speech can be stripped away, at any time and for any reason. You don’t have to be a horrible person for it to happen. The business currently in control of your speech just has to find it inconvenient.

    Donald Trump was a horrible person and he wasn’t banned from his social media accounts because he incited his supporters to violence and they overtook the US Capitol. Donald Trump was banned because his continued presence on various social media platforms was about to cost those platforms more than he was returning in investment. Those two events just happen to look very similar from where we’re sitting.

    Trump used to be very, very good for business. His presence on Twitter, with more than 88 million followers, saw the president wielding the social network like a weapon. But it also saw vast amounts of traffic directed to the service — simply because America’s mad king was starting a nuclear war with Kim Jong Un, or whatever other mental achievement he was attempting this week. Trump is controversial but, most importantly, he didn’t really get anything substantial done on the platform. And Twitter wasn’t about to kick him off the service when he hadn’t actually done anything.

    Ditto Facebook, which went out of its way to bend the rules governing Trump and his supporter’s conduct on the social network. Trump and those in his orbit pushed heavily against Facebook’s boundaries but it was worth Mark Zuckerberg’s time (and money) to keep him around. Because he was more valuable standing inside and pissing out than he was standing outside and pissing in.

    Until, that is, his actions — which always had a real-world effect — became too much to ignore. Not solely for the effect Trump and his sycophants may have had on American democracy but because being complicit in that would cost Facebook, Twitter, Google and the rest actual money. Traditional media — which was instrumental in putting Trump in the White House — won’t ever answer for Donald Trump. But big tech is also hoping to dodge the blame, in the form of investigations, that could affect their bottom line, and possible forced restructuring. Unless, that is, they hit him with the banhammer as hard as they can.

    Deplatforming’s bad?

    So Donald Trump and a selection of his fans were kicked off various platforms in 2021. And they were mostly kicked off because of the potential threat to the company coffers — only nobody’s ever going to be honest about that. There are all manner of reasons being given for why he had to go but they’re all just good public relations. The people who gave him his platform were making money from it. And they suddenly stood to lose out. Trump became bad for business.

    It just happens that business and broader social interests align at the moment. Kicking Trump out and banning QAnon — while these events will only drive conspiracy theories harder than ever — are actions that should have been taken ages ago. Trump was left in place because he made money. He was allowed to achieve what he did on social media thanks to business decisions and was only limited once he threatened the platform itself. Everything he did prior to the breaking point is being conveniently ignored. But it still happened. What’s taking place now is not censorship. It’s just business.

    It may be worth considering how your own speech is conducted, at this point. Though you’re not a maniacal American president, you stand an equally good chance at seeing your voice in the world turned out like a light. It may be because you’re an actual Nazi saying horrible things on the internet but it might also be the result of a policy change — a change in the way the people who supply your platforms do business. Blizzard did just that in 2019 when it banned one of its Hearthstone players for supporting Hong Kong. There was nothing political about it — Blizzard was limiting a threat to the company from the Chinese government.

    In an instance like this, you’ll find yourself cut off from the world’s avenues of discourse with very little recourse. Your online speech, in the forms it now exists, is mostly a vehicle for data collection, which ties back to advertising revenue for large companies. Taking it away from you is not censorship. It’s just ‘protecting the business model’.

    If Twitter decides to terminate your account, you’re unlikely to get it back. If they opted to do so for no reason at all, you’re still just as banned. Facebook might one day decide you’re not welcome (though in Facebook’s case, you’ll really have to not be worth the data they can harvest from you) and you’re cut off from the conversations that take place on its platforms. Facebook already wields its influence like a bludgeon, straight-up telling its WhatsApp users last week that they will either accept the company’s newest data collection policies or they must go elsewhere. The social media giant is confident that you won’t go anywhere else because this is where all the people are. It’s also incorrect on that last point.

    This is a point that isn’t considered enough: Social media companies present their platforms as places were people can interact but they all operate as a business, rather than a forum. They’ll reward awful behaviour if it pulls in the pennies and they’ll ban folks that cost them — be it revenue or reputation. Social media gives us the illusion of speech, but that illusion is only real for as long as you’re a good earner. You’ve been given a microphone and a gentleman at the other end of the wire is recording everything you say. But if you start costing him money, he’s not going to let you scream in the park with all his other captive birds any more.

    Column deplatforming Facebook featured Silicon Valley social media Twitter YouTube
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
    Brett Venter

    Related Posts

    Eskom electricity

    Eskom has discovered batteries

    August 9, 2022
    Social Media

    Why it’s important to think about social media use as a form of dissociation, rather than addiction

    August 9, 2022

    Twitter admits to a flaw in its system that exposed user data

    August 8, 2022

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    In The Mag
    Stuff August-September 2022 Latest Issue

    In This Issue – The Women in Tech (August-September 2022) Issue

    By Brett VenterAugust 1, 20220

    August is a pretty special month. It’s the host of International Women’s Day and is…

    2021 Wish List
    wish list Stuff Wish List 2021

    Stuff Wish List: for the tech impaired

    By Duncan PikeDecember 22, 20210

    Are you from the time before being glued to a smartphone was considered normal? Here’s…

    Wishlist DIY Stuff tech

    Stuff Wish List: for the DIY Diehard

    December 21, 2021
    Wish List Gearhead

    Stuff Wish List: For the petrol-soaked gearhead

    December 20, 2021
    outsiders

    Stuff Wish List: for the Outsiders

    December 17, 2021

    Latest Video

    Sonos

    SONOS Roam SL unboxing by Toby Shapshak

    Mini Cooper

    The Mini Cooper SE Electric with Toby Shapshak

    MSI Crosshair 15 Rainbox Six Extraction Edition unboxing

    MSI Crosshair 15 Rainbox Six Extraction Edition unboxing

    Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Unboxing

    Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra unboxing with Toby Shapshak

    Contact

    South Africa's Consumer Tech News Hub

    General: stuff@stuff.co.za
    Subscriptions: stuff@onthedot.co.za or 087 353 1291
    Editorial: 072 735 2614
    Sales: 083 375 2418

    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube SoundCloud

    Subscribe to Updates

    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy & POPI
    • My account
    © 2022 Stuff Group. Designed by Chronon.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.