Devised by a team of scientists from South Africa’s Stellenbosch University, the device is currently being patented and the Technology Innovation Agency has funded a prototype in preparation for commercialisation by April 2016
Pathogenic organisms infect about 250 million people a year. At least 8%, around 20 million people, die. Early detection of infections can prevent many deaths.
Since the nanochip was announced as a project of the university in September 2014 progress has been made in developing additional sensing mechanisms, enhancing its capabilities.
How the nanochip was born
The nanochip for early detection of infection came after a chance meeting between the author and microbiologist Leon Dicks, an expert in the field of superconductors and nanoelectrical devices.
While discussing individual current research, we agreed to work to find a way of detecting infections early and accurately.
The basis for our research was Piezoelectricity, which is how crystals convert mechanical energy into electricity or vice-versa.
The sensor that was developed for this purpose comprises a nanochip stacked with zinc oxide molecules on top of each other to create millions of nanowires.
Piezoelelectric energy plays a key role in the identification process. When certain materials, such as zinc oxide wires, are squeezed or pressed they generate an electric charge in response to applied mechanical stress. The slightest disturbance in the structure of the nanowires on the chip leads to piezoelectric energy. This is then converted to electrical energy and amplified to produce a voltage reading.
Microorganisms, such as bacteria, are known as flagellated microorganisms. Flagella are almost like little tails that are fixed to the organism. Vigorous movement of the flagella is used to propel the organisms at quite a high speed. These movements disturb the nanowires to generate an electronic signal due to the piezoelectric effect.
The nanochip will use a flexible substrate that would generate electricity by movement of a person’s body, thereby, for example, charging the battery of an electronic device, such as a pacemaker.
To be able to use the nanochip for infection detection, a biological flavour was added to the sensor and application by adding a lure that would attract specific bacteria. A silicon chip, measuring 1cm square, was stacked with zinc oxide molecules on top of each other to create a nanowire.
The concept was tested by attaching lysozyme molecules to the tip of each nanowire. Bacteria buster lysozyme was chosen for the test because it is in abundance in human saliva, tears and milk.
As soon as lysozyme-specific antibodies sticks to the nanowires, the zinc oxide molecules were realigned. This movement was detected by a change in the electrical output in 15 minutes. The lysozome-specific antibodies stuck to the lysozome molecules. The movement caused by this attraction and attachment process disturbed the nanowires, resulting in an electric signal being generated.
What we found
The investigation showed that the zinc oxide nanowires are promising piezoelectric nanoforce transducers that may be developed into biomolecular detection systems.
Binding of antibodies to the biosensor surface indicates a strong piezoelectric effect on the biosensing signal. The designed nanoforce biosensor showed a linear relationship with respect to voltage output and antibody concentration.
The results showed that it is possible to detect biomolecular interactions by coupling the piezotronic and biosensing characteristics of zinc oxide nanowires.
What does this mean
A patient swallowing a capsule containing a nanochip for detecting infections caused by pathogens, such as E.coli, V.cholera or Salmonella will know immediately the cause of their illness.
The production of antibodies is the natural mechanism for humans and animals to fight bacterial infections. Antibodies are specific to pathogens and by choosing the specific antibodies to attach to the piezoelectric sensor, it becomes possible to detect the specific pathogen that is tested for. The possibilities of utilising this concept for the detection of different infections or the presence of different types of bacteria are thus legion.
Using an antigen-specific nanochip could also provide an excellent platform for testing water quality in remote rural areas.
Testing for certain bacterial infections does not necessarily have to be done inside the patient’s body. A drop of blood or a patient’s sputum could be tested for diseases, such as tuberculosis, on a hand-held nanochip testing station outside the body.
Furthermore, the nanochip biological sensor method could play an important role in the detection and control of post-operative infection. Surgeons could implant a nanochip during open heart or orthopaedic surgery. By doing this they are mindful of infections where early detection and treatment is key.
The use of piezoelectric energy is not the only possible vehicle for detection of disease. The sensor also uses the piezoelectric effect to detect the pathogens by attaching antibodies to the sensor. The sensor attracts the specific pathogens.
Other mechanisms can be used to detect the presence of pathogens in a patient’s body. These mechanisms also use antibodies as bait.
The method of detection can be optical, when attracted pathogens interfere with the transmission of light through an optical fibre coated with a scaffolding structure with antibodies attached to it. It may be resistive when the pathogens alter the resistance of a sensing structure. It is capacitive when the pathogens change the dielectric constant of the sensing structure.
It may be resistive when the pathogens alter the resistance of a sensing structure. It is capacitive when the pathogens change the dielectric constant of the sensing structure.
We look at different sensing structures, obviously with the antibodies attached, to use different sensing techniques. Other methods, including optical, resistive and capacitive sensing techniques, are currently being looked at.
Apart from the lives saved by early detection and treatment of infections, the nanochip biological sensor approach could become a less expensive diagnostic method if manufactured on a large scale. Costs would be reduced.
- Vice Dean: Research in the Faculty of Engineering at Stellenbosch University
- This article first appeared on The Conversation